Paragon NTFS for Mac vs Tuxera NTFS for Mac. Following are the comparison between Paragon NTFS for Mac and Tuxera NTFS for Mac from 3 aspects: 1. Compatibility: Both Paragon NTFS for Mac and Tuxera NTFS for Mac are compatible with the currently latest macOS 10.15 Catalina or 10.14 Mojave. 2.
Here is the comparison between NTFS-3G and Tuxera NTFS for Mac from 3 aspects: 1. Cost: Tuxera NTFS for Mac is the most expensive, charging US$31. Paragon NTFS for Mac sales for US$19.95, while NTFS-3G is free. 2. Software stability: Developed from NTFS-3G, Tuxera NTFS for Mac performs much better than NTFS-3G. From the user feedback of Tuxera ...
· Tuxera is actually a principle developer of NTFS-3G, and the commercial product is built on top of it with some substantial proprietary improvements to performance. Paragon Because it’s not based on NTFS-3G, it should be immune to some of the performance oddities of NTFS-3G, as well.
Tuxera NTFS: Mac OS X performance comparison 1000 mp3 files (total size: 6.31 GB / 5.88 GiB) 4.7 GB / 4.38 GiB file (representing a DVD image) Test devices: 1.5 TB SATA (3.0 Gbps link, NCQ) 7200 rpm hard drive (Seagate) 500 GB USB 2.0 hard drive (LaCie brand w/ Samsung 7200 rpm drive inside)
· Before that, Paragon NTFS cost $100. Now Paragon was forced to lower to $19.95 (but that's per-computer, and then you still need to pay its upgrade-costs for every computer every year, haha). Tuxera NTFS for Mac is only 25 EUR ($31) as a life-time license for 1 person on as many computers as you own (unlimited)! That means free upgrades on as ...
It's always a good idea to seek the advice of others, but that doesn't mean you have to take it.
‹ | › | |||||
Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | St | Su |